He agreed with the columnist that the actress should be called for comment before revealing the affair, as without a response it would be “impossible to publish”. Shields also apologized for the way Rebel Wilson’s relationship was handled by the publication. Read it too BBC transgender story raises questions about inclusive language and representation But we need to make it clear that the deadline is not an ultimatum.”
It would be much worse to write gossip articles about unexpected events in their lives before they had a chance to voice their opinions. We still have to ask questions, sometimes very difficult ones. “Celebrities have a huge impact on our culture. Hornery, a gay man, said that in the future, the article will “ensure that the extra layer of complexity people face when it comes to their sexuality is always taken into account” when reporting same-sex relationships. In response to the backlash on Monday, the 13th, editor Bevan Shields and columnist Andrew Hornery publicly apologized to the actress and claimed the abuse while approaching their relationship. The case garnered international attention over the weekend and garnered more celebrity support for Rebel Wilson. Newspaper apologizes to Rebel Wilson with negative reaction I do not claim to be speaking for Rebel Wilson.īut the results, which for LGBTQIA+ individuals are nothing more than a hiss about who to spread the gossip, can have devastating effects Your newspaper has no right to know anything about anyone’s private life. But for LGBTQIA+ individuals, the results of gossip publishers, which are nothing more than tantrums, can have devastating effects.” “I do not intend to speak for rebel Wilson. Australian actress Magda Szubanski wrote that the newspaper has no “divine right” to know anyone’s private life. This position further fueled the anger of Rebel Wilson’s fans and supporters. “As other newspaper teams do every day, we simply asked questions and set a deadline for answers as standard practice.” But on Sunday 12, the Herald’s editor, Bevan Shields, insisted on her mistake in defending the columnist: qiPZkYFmkaĪndrew Hornery’s column was taken down with criticism. The broadcast texted Rebel Wilson saying they’d be kicking him out in 2 days, and now he’s complaining that he chose to reveal his relationship with a woman himself. I just read this Smash it 3 times to make sure I’m not misreading. Journalists, actors and celebrities sided with Rebel Wilson, demonstrating that they did not believe the columnist’s double audacity: first, by pressuring the actress to make a threatening deadline, and second, by feeling “unjust” with her disclosure. The reaction to the Australian newspaper was immediate. “The choice to ignore our confidential, candid and honest questions was disappointing to us.” Hornery critically accused the actress of stealing the ‘journalistic scoop’ and said she “chosen to capitalize on the story” when informed that the newspaper would expose the affair. The next day, however, an unfortunate surprise came: In a column in the Sydney Morning Herald, journalist Andrew Hornery revealed that he already knew about Rebel Wilson’s affair and even gave him two days to take a stand.
A post shared by Rebel Wilson first glance, Rebel’s fans and colleagues thought that the relationship only arose on the occasion of Pride Month.